Miscellaneous Questions and Requests
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 8:21 pm
After a heavy weekend getting into iScore, I have a few questions and requests:
1. When adding players to a team's roster, as you have to do for a team you're playing for the first time, it seems like you have to do a lot of tapping to do the job. You select "Add a Player", then "New Player", then you have to click in the First Name field. It would save a click if the cursor was already in the First Name field. Following this, you have to hit Done which takes you back to the Roster screen and do it all again for the next player. It would be nice if you could make multiple entries on the same screen.
2. With a 10 player defense the fielders from left to tight are marked as Left Field, Center Field, Other Field, and Right Field. And the players are numbered from left to right as 7, 8, 10, 9. The people I have talked to who keep score for the team refer to the outfielders as LF(7), LC(8), RC(9), and RF(10). Is there a particular reason iScore uses the convention they do, or could you adopt the latter method listed here?
3. In the Scorecard when a runner is advanced by a batter, iScore shows "AB7", or "AB5", etc' I think it would be helpful if iScore listed the batting order numbers from 1 to whatever down the left side of the scorecard. This way you wouldn't have to count down the list to see who is batter 7 or batter 5.
4. In viewing the Team Batting statistics, I noticed that the order of the players names is not in the batting order for that game, nor is it in the order of the names in the Team Roster. It's not alphabetical on first or last names and it's not in uniform number order. But it is consistent over the three games I've scored for this team. I just can't figure out why it's in this order. I think the batting stats for each game should list the batters in the order they batted for that particular game.
Thanks for giving us this forum to make suggestions. You folks at FTM are doing a great job and your quick response to our questions is amazing. If only all support organizations were as responsive as FTM, all users of any product would be a lot happier!!!
1. When adding players to a team's roster, as you have to do for a team you're playing for the first time, it seems like you have to do a lot of tapping to do the job. You select "Add a Player", then "New Player", then you have to click in the First Name field. It would save a click if the cursor was already in the First Name field. Following this, you have to hit Done which takes you back to the Roster screen and do it all again for the next player. It would be nice if you could make multiple entries on the same screen.
2. With a 10 player defense the fielders from left to tight are marked as Left Field, Center Field, Other Field, and Right Field. And the players are numbered from left to right as 7, 8, 10, 9. The people I have talked to who keep score for the team refer to the outfielders as LF(7), LC(8), RC(9), and RF(10). Is there a particular reason iScore uses the convention they do, or could you adopt the latter method listed here?
3. In the Scorecard when a runner is advanced by a batter, iScore shows "AB7", or "AB5", etc' I think it would be helpful if iScore listed the batting order numbers from 1 to whatever down the left side of the scorecard. This way you wouldn't have to count down the list to see who is batter 7 or batter 5.
4. In viewing the Team Batting statistics, I noticed that the order of the players names is not in the batting order for that game, nor is it in the order of the names in the Team Roster. It's not alphabetical on first or last names and it's not in uniform number order. But it is consistent over the three games I've scored for this team. I just can't figure out why it's in this order. I think the batting stats for each game should list the batters in the order they batted for that particular game.
Thanks for giving us this forum to make suggestions. You folks at FTM are doing a great job and your quick response to our questions is amazing. If only all support organizations were as responsive as FTM, all users of any product would be a lot happier!!!